Compare Life Insurance

Written by Guest Author
Posted February 2, 2009 at 4:10 am

Life Insurance For Our Family | Insert Fashion Here
Life Insurance should not be something that you want to compromise on just because you can’t afford it. As long as you are alive and health, there are no. read more…

Trying to Understand Life Insurance for the Over 50s | doddsco.com
Insurance lingo is a foreign language written in the English alphabet. Apparently, an insurance sales person isn’t just a business person, they are translators. I’ve been looking for some affordable life insurance for … read more…

Get Life Insurance » Blog Archive » Estate Planning with …
Between choices of a traditional survivorship life insurance or a term survivivoship plan you now have some tremendous options for planning your estate. Life Insurance companies really have become competitive and when it … read more…

From Google Blog Search

Do You Make These Mistakes In Choosing Your Health Care Plan
There are a lot of details to consider when you are choosing a health care plan, whether it?s one offered through your employer or one you buy on your own. No matter what age you are, your health shou… read more…

Life Insurance As An Investment In Your Future
When my older brother suffered stroke and is hospitalized for almost a month, I experienced what it like is to have a family member as a patient. Suffering a stroke is a problem in itself, but add to … read more…

Individual Health Care Plans – When Buying Your Own Private Health Care is Your Only Option
When it comes to health care plans, individual health insurance offers a wide array of options to meet you and your family’s needs.

No matter whether you have lost your health benefits due to termi… read more…

From GoArticles.com

Open Question: Why must our media always dominate the airwaves with 1 subject and 1 subject only?
Whether it’s Sarah Palin, Barack Obama, OJ Simpson, etc… they are always talking about that thing only. When will they learn that we want a diverse media? And by diverse I don’t mean setting up various conflicts in order to promote some capitalist rivalry agenda in order to make more money. They could honestly give 2 sh**s about the news obviously so what is it going to take to get it through to them?

For instance, before I found Progressive Auto Insurance I was paying out the rear end from companies like Geico that are talking out of their rear end when it comes to the promotions they fund compared to what their actual rates are. I saved 250 dollars on my very first car by going with Progressive but what if Progressive never was? What if Progressive never existed at all? Then I would be stuck with Geico.
You might say that someone may have taken Geico’s place, but whom exactly would? It’s a dog eat dog world and a business modeled around the 90s way of doing things should no longer be allowed to succeed in the new millennium.

Why then aren’t there rules in place for these businesses? Why then are they just allowed to do whatever they want until they jump right off a cliff like these banks have done? Can we really trust them? About as far as we can trust anybody else which these days isn’t very many people from what I’ve seen.

So let’s say we could put rules in place… what would be the rules? What sort of policy would we think up to push this in the right direction without totally nationalizing the business? We don’t need to mandate what they are doing but we simply define what they are allowed to do just like it is with our constitution. They should not be allowed to get away with bloody murder putting up every piece of useless news they can get their greedy FOREIGN hands on… and neither should other businesses be allowed to do so much severe destruction to themselves that they risk the very lives of themselves as well as their customers and this nation.

Please no comments like, “Is there a question in there somewhere”. Don’t waste my time.